Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: nothingnew

Thanks, it was a typo here on this thread I believe...not on the site it linked to. I’ll ask the mods if they can fix it.


63 posted on 06/13/2012 8:10:04 AM PDT by Jeff Head (Freedom is not free, never has been, never will be (www.dragonsfuryseries.com))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]


If the guy was interfering with a child, no jury will convict dad of anything. In any case, a guilty pedophile would be assumed to resisting detention with force and the father’s action becomes self defense.
On the other hand, if the guy WAS NOT interfering with or molesting the kid and the dad jumped to an unwarranted conclusion, that is a horse of a different color. I hope that is not the case.


64 posted on 06/13/2012 8:27:07 AM PDT by Godwin1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson