[PeterPrinciple]

If a homersexual wanted to pass out stuff at our church celebrations what would we want the ruling to be?

[kevcol]

If a homersexual wanted to pass out stuff at our church celebrations what would we want the ruling to be?

You mean, if your church was holding a celebration at a public park, and had a non-exclusive permit to use the park, and a homosexual wanted to pass out non-pornographic literature that met community standards of decency....right?

Because the argument you made (as stated) leaves out that bit. Did you do that on purpose?

[Persevero]

“If a homersexual wanted to pass out stuff at our church celebrations what would we want the ruling to be?”

I believe the difference here is between public and private property.

They are meeting on public property, therefore, it should be accessible to the public.

If they rent their own hall or meet in their own house, it’s different.

[a fool in paradise]

Your church is on private property.

The godless Atheist brigade has already seen to it that religious gatherings on public property are shunned and prohibited.

But the lavender mafia has their taxpayer and corporate sponsored gay pride orgies nationally this month. Weeeee.