You have logic fail.
either way, it should be an individual choice. The Right of the people to Keep and BEAR arms, shall not be infringed.
Period. Open, concealed, blade, blackpowder, machine gun, anti-aircraft canons, GAU-8, or a fully appointed Navy Destroyer...
Shall not be infringed.
Shall not be infringed. It may be “stupid” to open carry, but it is your God-given right. I’m all for freedom. In some circumstances, some of us choose to mkeep quiet rather than speaking-up. It is a choice. It is freedom. The cops need educated...possibly by lawsuit.
A difference of opinion is what makes a horse race...but I have noticed that the open carry opinions never go open carry in the inner cities. They wouldn’t make it 2 blocks. And no one would know which direction the shots came from....Those that use their guns for self defense don’t advertise it...they have nothing to prove to others...just a difference of opinion....
You are correct, shall not be infringed. But because the state is already infringing on his rights he had to carry this way. The state infringes when it says he cannot purchase a handgun, therefore he has no choice but to carry openly.