To: detective
I would appreciate any comments you might have based upon the Abstract and the "difference-in-differences design research" style utilized.
Page two has something interesting as well...
First we investigate whether the laws increase justifiable homicide by private citizens. Importantly, justifiable homicide is defined as the killing of a felon, during commission of a felony, by private citizen.
Yeah, some real twists and turns in this one.
56 posted on
06/12/2012 6:27:37 AM PDT by
philman_36
(Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
To: philman_36
some real twists and turns in this one. Seems to me like the study tried to be rational, yet the typical idiotic and agenda-driven journalism major typed up a headline to create a stir, solely to help circulation. As usual.
81 posted on
06/12/2012 7:21:20 AM PDT by
Teacher317
('Tis time to fear when tyrants seem to kiss.)
To: philman_36
These are economics professors. They have no experience in law enforcement, criminology or solving real world problems. All they did was compare FBI crime statistics for states with and without stand your ground laws over a period of time. They did no analysis of any other factors. The 500 to 700 number is just extrapolation. It is not an actual count of anything.
They specifically said that they defined justifiable homicide as only killing a felon during commission of a felony. It did not include self-defense, etc.
This “study” does not prove anything other than a few correlations. Their conclusions are probably not valid.
To: philman_36
???? that sounds like a bizarre interpretation of justifiable homicide.
like a definition of their own making.
100 posted on
06/12/2012 9:02:12 AM PDT by
TurboZamboni
(Looting the future to bribe the present)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson