Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Afisra
One quote from the article that annoys me:
The laws remove the so called 'duty to retreat' which dates from English Common Law. That tradition holds that before a person can use deadly force against an attacker, they must first take affirmative steps to defuse the situation.
The Common Law "duty to retreat" applied to an affray(brawl, fight between two or more people). If you were involved in a drunken brawl, or a fight over who disrespected who, then each participant has a legal duty to retreat rather than escalate the level of violence.

This "duty to retreat" did NOT give any duty to retreat from robbers, rapists, etc.

47 posted on 06/12/2012 6:17:04 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 (If I can't be persuasive, I at least hope to be fun.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: PapaBear3625

“...they must first take affirmative steps to defuse the situation”

IMHO, a perp contracting a sudden case of terminal high-velocity lead poisoning will most affirmatively “defuse” the situation.

I approve.


76 posted on 06/12/2012 7:03:58 AM PDT by Ignatz (Winner of a prestigious 1960 Y-chromosome award!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson