Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: D-fendr
Because, simply following the history of this event, any questions arise out of a domestic dispute.

Only an Islamic Court would have ignored that fact.

409 posted on 06/15/2012 10:00:42 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 408 | View Replies ]


To: muawiyah

The supporters of the legislation say the law is to address a court ruling that citizens have “no right to reasonably resist unlawful entry by police officers.” IOW, irrespective of whatever case or reason for the ruling - as the ruling effects all cases.

If the reason for the legislation does not concern any particular case or situation, why should the legislation?

Are you saying the law *should* have some sections or provisions specifically for domestic disputes that isn’t covered in some other law?


410 posted on 06/15/2012 10:17:14 AM PDT by D-fendr (Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 409 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson