Officer Jason Henry arrived on the scene and observed that Barnes was very agitated and was yelling. Barnes continued to yell, loudly and did not lower his voice until Reed warned that he would be arrested for disorderly conduct. Barnes retorted, if you lock me up for Disorderly Conduct, youre going to be sitting right next to me in a jail cell. Mary came onto the parking lot, threw a black duffle bag in Barness direction, told him to take the rest of his stuff, and returned to the apartment. Reed and Henry followed Barnes back to the apartment. Mary entered the apartment, followed by Barnes, who then turned around and blocked the doorway. Barnes told the officers that they could not enter the apartment and denied Reeds requests to enter and investigate. Mary did not explicitly invite the officers in, but she told Barnes several times, dont do this and just let them in. Reed attempted to enter the apartment, and Barnes shoved him against the wall. A struggle ensued, and the officers used a choke hold and a taser to subdue and arrest Barnes. Barnes suffered an adverse reaction to the taser and was taken to the hospital. From the court record
The police did not have permission to enter and did not have probable cause either. If they had probable cause then they could have arrested Mr. Barnes in the parking lot.
You really have to go back to first causes ~ why the cops are there. They are there because they were called by a citizen who is otherwise lawfully possessing her abode and she said she wanted help.
Br'r Barnes had no right to interfere with her right of access to the cops. He had no right whatsoever to demand the cops leave.
That's the whole issue. That issue will be brought up every time there's the slightest challenge in court to the application of this particular law (the one just passed).