Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: muawiyah
She still had a right to call the cops ~ and they had a right to be secure in their persons ~ they don't lose their constitutional rights simply because they work for the government.

And we have a right to be secure on our persons, and we don't lose our Constitutional rights simply because the invades works for the government. Odd how you ignore those facts so completely.

101 posted on 06/12/2012 6:54:07 AM PDT by Teacher317 ('Tis time to fear when tyrants seem to kiss.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]


To: Teacher317
And we have a right to be secure IN our persons, and we don't lose our Constitutional rights simply because the invadER works for the government. Odd how you ignore those facts so completely.

(Spell-check doesn't always help LOL)

102 posted on 06/12/2012 6:55:40 AM PDT by Teacher317 ('Tis time to fear when tyrants seem to kiss.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies ]

To: Teacher317
Where I use the word "she" referring to the private person whose rights were violated BY HER EX, that's exactly where I am putting the emphasis.

You, on the other hand, are more intent on the abusive "ex".

Can you tell us why you think the former husband (who has moved out) Has rights superior to his former wife?

154 posted on 06/12/2012 11:15:32 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson