To: TexasCajun
...then Holder will be held in contempt? The committee votes on a resolution that would then, if passed, go to the full house "committee" (the entire house) for a vote. I'm not sure, if that is passed, if it needs another vote by the full house. Then, he is in "contempt".
13 posted on
06/11/2012 6:52:16 AM PDT by
C210N
("ask not what the candidate can do for you, ask what you can do for the candidate" (Breitbart, 2012))
To: C210N
Once that happens, he can be impeached.
14 posted on
06/11/2012 6:54:12 AM PDT by
C210N
("ask not what the candidate can do for you, ask what you can do for the candidate" (Breitbart, 2012))
To: C210N
Thanks, let's see how all the Republicans on the committee vote.
You would think the had the votes to make an announcement.
To: C210N
The committee votes on a resolution that would then, if passed, go to the full house "committee" (the entire house) for a vote. I'm not sure, if that is passed, if it needs another vote by the full house. Then, he is in "contempt".Which would be done in 2013?
49 posted on
06/11/2012 7:49:55 AM PDT by
ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas
(Fool me once, shame on you -- twice, shame on me -- 100 times, it's U. S. immigration policy.)
To: C210N
Then, he is in "contempt". I already have contempt for him. Even more so his boss.
129 posted on
06/12/2012 11:57:19 AM PDT by
mountn man
(Happiness is not a destination, its a way of life.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson