You can say “the term natural born citizen, has been in world wide use since long before the writing of the Constitution. common terms need no definition” until you are blue, but it seems that the constitution did not define it, leaving up to lawyers and judges to do so. Seems that the “common” definition is one who is a citizen who was born that way, not naturalized later. I state it again, there is no constitutional definition of “natural born citizen.”
they didn’t define the word ‘trade’ either, yet people with a working frontal lobe have been able to ponder its meaning
denying the meaning, even as statement by supreme court justices (minor v happersett 1876), just means your trying to deceive (and have a touch of psychosis).
again, your ignorance was not their problem