Wow. So insightful. So tell me, constitutional expert, where in the constitution it says both parents have to be citizens for one to be “natural born”? Seems to me that the issue is that the constitution is a little vague in that respect. Since many of the founding fathers had parents from other countries, it would seem to me that parental birthplace may not have been critical. Being born a citizen was their intent, not instituting a complex system of citizen rank.
wow, you really can’t spend 10 minutes to read the Constitution. obviously you’re a DU cockroach, but it’ll stomp you for the amusement of others
from article 2 section 1:
“No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.”
now, deploying basic third grade reading skills, one is able to easily see that the founders had written an exception for themselves:
“or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution”
also, realize that they made a distinction between a citizen and a natural born citizen. people were born within the United States at the time, but their parents may not have been. additionally, their parents were most likely not citizens of the US, as it didnt exist and many people were immigrants
As the founders made such a distinction further reinforces the definition of a Natural born citizen as they wanted to emphisize that just being a citizen was not enough. they wanted to insure that the person in the top office did not have split allegiances, at least by birth. this was also discussed in the federalist papers.
the distinction between citizen and natural born citizen is further emphasized as one notes the other offices only require a person to be a citizen, leaving only the office of the president to have the natural born requirement. if they were the same, there wouldn’t be such a distinction
additionally, the term natural born citizen, has been in world wide use since long before the writing of the Constitution. common terms need no definition.
your ignorance was not their problem
http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/constitution_transcript.html