To: Diogenesis
Relax.
There’s 2016 to run against Romney.
Right now, let’s get Obama out of the WH.
To: Cringing Negativism Network
Bigtime dittos to what you said!!!
ABO We Can!!!!
8 posted on
06/10/2012 3:14:41 PM PDT by
FlingWingFlyer
(Free Stuff or Freedom! You Decide 2012.)
To: Cringing Negativism Network
Good point. I’ll remind myself of that when I vote ABO.
15 posted on
06/10/2012 3:21:03 PM PDT by
TwelveOfTwenty
(With choices like Palin, Cain, and Bachmann, what could go wrong? Now we know.)
To: Cringing Negativism Network
AGREE 1,000%
If Comrade Soetoro wins, America will fall to communism and future elections will be history.
Soetoro MUST BE STOPPED AT ALL COSTS IF AMERICA IS TO SURVIVE.
22 posted on
06/10/2012 3:36:07 PM PDT by
newfreep
(Breitbart sent me...)
To: Cringing Negativism Network
“Right now, lets get Obama out of the WH.”
The unions, the gays, the abortionists, the communists and the dependent class MUST be defeated THIS election or we could lose the country as we know if for decades.
While I argued against Romney strongly here, we have to see him as the figure head of a collision to get rid of the Obamanation.
With a Republican Senate, it could keep his liberal tendencies in check.
36 posted on
06/10/2012 3:57:34 PM PDT by
garjog
To: Cringing Negativism Network
Agreed.
I always vote for the most conservative candidate on the ballot. Romney was nowhere on my radar in the primary, but he is the only choice in the general.
I will reluctantly vote for him, do all I can to hold his feet to the fire, and if he doesn't govern as a conservative, try to defeat him in the next primary.
44 posted on
06/10/2012 4:21:50 PM PDT by
comebacknewt
(Newt (sigh) what could have been . . .)
To: Cringing Negativism Network; Diogenesis; All
Relax.
Theres 2016 to run against Romney.
Right now, lets get Obama out of the WH.
Who are you trying to kid here?
I keep seeing this bogus argument trotted out about how conservatives can dump Romney in 2016 for a more conservative nominee, and I'm here to tell you (and anyone else who cares to pay attention), that IF 'President Romney' makes even marginal improvements in his first term, that any joker thinking they can challenge him for the nomination in 2016 and WIN is only fooling themselves. The last time a sitting President was denied the nomination of his Party was in 1884 when President Chester Arthur was unable to stymie the challenge of James G. Blaine. Now some clever analysts will suggest that LBJ was denied the nomination in 1968, however he announced that he would NOT be a candidate, and whatever reasons prompted that decision, he did not end up in Chicago being stripped of the nomination.
Now having said all this, I will point out that to successfully challenge an incumbent President requires immense political skill, far greater popularity with the public, LOTS and LOTS of money, AND encouragement from the Party leadership. Look at the 'Rats, was there ever a weaker candidate than that pathetic Kenyan douchebag? But there are no true challengers to his being renominated. Even Jimmy Carter delivered on his bravado to "whip Kennedy's ass" and indeed beat back Fat Teddy's challenge in 1980, not that it did him any good.
Conclusion: unless 'President Romney' is a far worse political operator than 0bama himself, he will be essentially a lock for renomination in 2016, and anyone believing otherwise needs to put down the bong.
53 posted on
06/10/2012 4:45:27 PM PDT by
mkjessup
(Eternal Vigilance (aka FReeper Tom Hoefling) has my vote for President in 2012.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson