Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Tau Food
I just hope that after Romney loses, his fans will be willing to join with real conservatives to create a united unanimous front.

You mean when they're lined up against the wall when the socialist revolution comes? Because this country won't be worth a devil's squat if 0bama is running it for four more years.

I just hope after Romney wins, real conservatives will hold him and other Republicans accountable for all promises made.

25 posted on 06/10/2012 3:44:43 PM PDT by Tanniker Smith (Rome didn't fall in a day, either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: Tanniker Smith
I just hope after Romney wins, real conservatives will hold him and other Republicans accountable for all promises made.

If Romney wins on a landslide, surely a glowing mandate from Americans that they love this open-minded Republican from Massachusetts, how much heat do you think "real conservatives" would yield against a moderate president joined by moderate GOPE and moderates already in Congress? When that president was swept in by a landslide "mandate" to extend the brand of conservatism he championed in Massachusetts?

Oh, I know, right now that's not the way it is, and we all -- including Romney -- know it. Now it's about ABO. There's a hysteria on the wind, the mantra "we can't survive another four years" of a despised sockpuppet scarecrow when conservatives are united and gaining in Congress. Maybe the hysteria is right.

Though it's probably wrong. Obama isn't All Powerful Oz.

We had better hope our conservatives in Congress can hold Romney accountable for all the promises he made (what promises?), because Romney has always played hardball in power politics. About the best thing to hope for is that conservatives are a majority among the Republicans. Romney was a ruthless campaigner; people who say "he's not a fighter" need to ask how he got to where he is. This part 2 of the 2008 primary campaign. Romney is dogged.

And he would be dogged in his opposition of the "minority" conservative Republicans who would fight his takes on global warming, nationalied health care, activist judges, abortion, and the gay agenda. After all, Romney was, his people would constantly remind us, given a huge mandate. People wanted him in charge!

And watch things careen "severely" left.

It's my duty to vote -- and I decline to vote for either of those two -- I will vote for breaking down their mandate by voting for a third party on-the-ballot name. It's the third option and, by my calculations, the one in the best interest of limited government conservatism.

75 posted on 06/10/2012 5:53:15 PM PDT by Finny (A deal with the devil is ALWAYS a losing proposition. Voting for Romney to avoid Obama is just that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson