Cash. Money. Tons of it. PACs piled on PACs stacked on SuperPACs, trying for 20 years now to flush conservatism right out of the body politic with huge lube-jobs of targeted political money.
A couple of those PACs are in the habit of shooting max donations and steering/bundling lots more, to people opposing anyone with a smell of "family values" about him -- even at the alderman level, or county commissioner, or state representative in some flyover High Plains state like Iowa.
George W. Bush was cozying up to the Log Cabins back in 2000, while sending Rove around to hold hands with -- and lie to -- the Ralph Reed-led Christian Coalition Republicans, at the very same time Bush was dining in state with the Loggies, and his advance woman Mary Matalin was telling the gays that Bush favored SSM, opposition to which she branded "unfair". No, really -- it's out there. Old article from 10-12 years ago.
Money, tons of money, from people who never had to raise kids, but who have all sorts of hate for those who did.
The idea “thou shalt marry and be given in marriage” is corrupt and degenerate, which is an impossible immortality of a kind (i.e., eternal love), but not of the persons of men.
In your unabridged Oxford Dictionaries, the word “faggotry” denotes the bundling of steel to be hammered or rolled together.
Mammalian evolution is entirely heterosexual.
Monogamy is not required for evolution, monogamy is a tenet of religion.
To prohibit polyandry and polygyny is an ecclesiastic rule of law.
To establish an ecclesiastic standard of monogamy for homosexuals is nothing but RELIGIOUS FAGGOTRY.
All men are born of a woman.
If you have to tell grown men that babies will not come out of their rectums, there is no hope for any rational discourse...
The government of men’s external actions by religion, pretending the change of nature in their consecrations cannot be esteemed a work extraordinary, it is no other than a conjuration or incantation, whereby they would have men to believe an alteration of nature that is contrary to the testimony of sight and of all the rest of the senses.
The praeterpolitical power of the churches to institute monogamy as an ecclesiastic rule of law enabled them to determine the legitimacy of the succession of the pagan kings, abrogate the natural rights to property and self-defense, as well as gave them power of ecclesiastic censure for divorce.
The ecclesiastics would have men believe they will receive condign punishment for their contumacy of monogamy, as opposed to the freedom of the polygamy found in nature, which is inherently pagan.