Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Colonel Kangaroo

***He played right into Osama’s hands with his Iraq decision. ***

Not necessarily. How many here remember that during the Iran-Iraq war that Saddam’s aircraft attacked US warships in the area.

http://www.nytimes.com/1987/05/24/world/1985-iraqi-attack-on-us-ship-cited.html

Or Saddam’s attack on Kuwait cutting off the oil supplies, or his constant harassment of our warplanes in the No-Fly zone as we attempted to help the Iraqis get rid of him. I will say that our efforts were vastly unappreciated as the Iraqis prefer a dictator of their own kind more than a foreign power helping them.


84 posted on 06/09/2012 8:50:56 AM PDT by Ruy Dias de Bivar (Anything Goes, Phantom of the Opera, Nice work if you can get it, EVITA. On BROADWAY last week.!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]


To: Ruy Dias de Bivar

Saddam Hussein was not a nice man. But compared to the alternatives he was best option. Christians had a much better life under Saddam than they do now. Saddam was an enemy of al-Qaeda and in protecting himself against them he was also serving American interests. Bush’s Iraq policy not only removed a roadblock to the expansion of al-Qaeda, it opened up a new recruitment area for terrorists and a new battleground for them to attack America. And a strong Iraq under Saddam was a check on Iran. The world would be a much better and safer place now had Bush not chosen to overextend our military and money on a counterproductive move into Iraq.


85 posted on 06/09/2012 9:40:17 AM PDT by Colonel Kangaroo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson