Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Psalm 144
I thought one of these bases was closed due to a volcano eruption. Can someone tell me which base was closed down? As far as a comment posted about a 100 year lease, I'm all for it. We also need to sign a contract stated they will pay 75% of the cost to have our people and equipment protect them from the Chinese. The Chinese have been developing their deep water navy for years. It's about time we do something to counter them.
109 posted on 06/09/2012 6:26:53 PM PDT by Nitehawk0325 (Conservatives over liberals every time. No discussion, no argument, no liberals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Nitehawk0325
I thought one of these bases was closed due to a volcano eruption. Can someone tell me which base was closed down?

Clark AFB, in the Angeles City area, was closed due to the 1991 Mt. Pinatubo eruption. Due to the upcoming expiration of our base leases in the Philippines in 1992, Clark AFB was declared a total loss and we did not attempt to repair the base or renew its lease, due to the Billion$$$ it would have cost to totally rebuild it.

Just prior to the 1991 eruption that destroyed Clark AFB, Clark was the largest U.S. Air Force Base outside the Continental United States. I believe that at the time I was stationed in nearby Subic Bay Naval Base in the mid to late 1980's, Clark had nearly 10,000 Air Force members stationed there. There is a good nostalgic website dedicated to Clark AFB that you can check out by clicking the link below:

http://www.clarkab.com/

The Subic Bay Naval Base was also heavily damaged by the 1991 Mt. Pinatubo eruption, but unlike Clark AFB, after the dependents were evacuated, the base was repaired and the dependents were returned. After Pinatubo, the U.S. did not attempt to renew the lease to Clark AFB, but instead attempted to just renew the lease and keep our naval base at Subic Bay.

As with Clark AFB, when the Subic Bay Naval Base was open, it was the largest Naval Base outside the United States. When I was there in the mid to late 1980's, there were approximately 5,000 or so sailors and marines stationed there. You could add a few thousand more who were there temporarily there for a few weeks to a few months and whenever 'the fleet' would pull in (a Carrier Battle group), you could add 10,000 sailors/marines in town and on base for liberty. (Back during the Vietnam War, Subic Bay could handle three Carrier battle groups in port at the same time.)

However, it all came to naught as the Philippine Senate in 1992 rejected any lease extension and ordered our remaining forces out of the Philippines by the end of that year. I believe the final personnel left Subic Bay in November, 1992 and returned total control of the Subic Bay Naval Base over to the Philippine Government. There is also a nostalgic website dedicated to the former Subic Bay Naval Base that you can click on below:

http://www.subicbaypi.com/home.htm

115 posted on 06/09/2012 11:58:46 PM PDT by dsm69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson