There might not be a very big difference between Zero and Mittens on domestic policy. But let’s not forget that the world is still a *very* dangerous place.
I don’t foresee a President Romney betraying our national security secrets the way Obama is now. Nor unilaterally cutting by 75% our nuclear arsenal, the way Obama is planning to do now. Nor helping bring the Muslim Brotherhood into power in Libya, Egypt, and now probably soon Syria, the way Obama is doing now.
China is increasing its military spending. Russia is increasing its military spending. Why do you think they are doing this now? And God only knows what the Islamists are up to and what help they’ve already received from Zero.
We are voting for just a president, but Commander-in-Chief also. That alone is important enough for me to vote reluctantly for Mittens in November.
Read kevao’s post more than once. Perhaps some of it might connect.
And I'm not the only one around here that feels that way.
I don’t foresee a President Romney betraying our national security secrets the way Obama is now. Nor unilaterally cutting by 75% our nuclear arsenal, the way Obama is planning to do now. Nor helping bring the Muslim Brotherhood into power in Libya, Egypt, and now probably soon Syria, the way Obama is doing now.Obama has issued a "wait until after the election" promise to the Russians on the subjects of US unilateral disarmament.