Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cripplecreek
Heavy trucks cause a lot of wear and tear on pavement — up to several thousands more times what an automobile causes. Truck licensing and fuel taxes do not cover the incremental costs. Therefore, less highway funding would be required, to move a given number of cars and light trucks.

Trains — including variants, such as the one proposed in the article, make a lot of sense for moving freight over long distances. Containerization makes it easy to switch modes for local pick up and delivery.

High-speed passenger rail seldom makes sense. Rail freight almost always makes sense.

38 posted on 06/06/2012 4:24:18 PM PDT by USFRIENDINVICTORIA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]


To: USFRIENDINVICTORIA

The thing is that you’ll never get trucks off the road unless you find a means of transporting goods to each individual retailer from the freight hubs. As it is now I think the average radius each freight rail hub covers is around 500 miles by truck.


40 posted on 06/06/2012 4:31:02 PM PDT by cripplecreek (What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson