Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Partisan Gunslinger

Your whole position now is reduced to saying that states have to wait for Congress to pass a law restricting their rights before they can exercise them. That’s an indefensible proposition, and certainly not a conservative one.

All it would take to remove that right completely, if your position were correct, would be for Congress to simply not act. POOF! The rights of the states are gone. Ludicrous.


138 posted on 06/19/2012 6:54:32 PM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies ]


To: Boogieman
Your whole position now is reduced to saying that states have to wait for Congress to pass a law restricting their rights before they can exercise them. That’s an indefensible proposition, and certainly not a conservative one.

There is a right to secede, but the Constitution that was agreed to by the states says that a state must allow the congress to pass the general laws of that act and the effects thereof. No right has been restricted, it was there from the beginning, and agreed to.

All it would take to remove that right completely, if your position were correct, would be for Congress to simply not act. POOF! The rights of the states are gone. Ludicrous.

The representatives of that state could bring secession up in the Congress and try to pass the way in a state secedes. If the Congress won't agree on a way or indefinitely waits, then there would be no argument that the process wasn't followed. But as it stands, that's never happened.

140 posted on 06/19/2012 7:34:42 PM PDT by Partisan Gunslinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson