(Well, this releases conservatives in WI from having to vote for Romney...Romney will lose, anyway)
We are told "all the time" NOT to vote for third-party candidates 'cause they "will lose, anyway."
This pragmatic utilitarianism cuts BOTH ways.
Those who don this pragmatic utilitarian lecturn need to apply it to Romney in Obama states:
* Romney will lose Wisconsin, the Left Coast (WA, OR, CA), NY, NJ, Maryland, CT, and is even behind in MA. [This is NOT a complete list of Obama states]
Therefore, there is NO good practical reason to vote for a pro-abort, big-govt socialist healthcare pioneer like Romney. The "anti-Obama" vote as a reason just doesn't work in states where Obama will win, anyway.
Sorry dude. I know living in this dream world is tough. Mitt will likely win by a significant margin. 20-30 EVs over the 281. Probably WI, certainly NC, NV, OH, VA, FL, MO, IA, probably NH and perhaps NM.
It is statistically impossible-—unless your a Romney hater or the drive-by media-—to reconcile such a massive R win and still somehow think that this won’t happen to Obama. The RCP average-—not exit polls-—were pretty close, and PPP, a Dem pollster, understated Walker’s victory by 3-4 points. So this state is not only in play, I’m betting it’s already a dead heat.