[Finny]

gos whines to JRF, who refuses to vote for a socialist Republican: Then you are voting for a lying, socialist, Kenyan born, spending, secretive etc., etc.

BULLSH*T.

Refusal to vote for Romney is wholly separated from voting for Obama, and it is sheer emotional fallacy to declare otherwise. You ONLY state such nonsense because you are ANGRY. Period.

Here's the reality: if it's O vs R in the presidential, those who intend to vote will have THREE options.

THREE.

1. Vote for Obama.

2. Vote for Romney.

3. Vote for another "third party" candidate in the presidential race. THIS VOTE WILL BE 100 PERCENT NEUTRAL in influencing whether O or R wins. THAT IS A MATHEMATICAL FACT.

You sound like a crybaby little girl on the playground stomping your foot and declaring that if I don't give you my candy, it's the same as giving it to someone else. Which, of course, is total BS.

You can vote for arsenic, you can vote for cyanide because it's not arsenic, or you can vote to dilute whichever poison wins.

I know how I'm voting, and I know that it isn't the equivalent of "voting for a lying, socialist, Kenyan born" etc. etc. YOU KNOW IT TOO.

[JRandomFreeper]

I won't vote for a pro-abortion, anti-gun, big government liberal. Ever.

/johnny

[JRandomFreeper]

My intransigence on that issue infuriates some.

/johnny

[mcshot]

Thank you. Seems I may be on wrong site.

[TwelveOfTwenty]

3. Vote for another "third party" candidate in the presidential race. THIS VOTE WILL BE 100 PERCENT NEUTRAL in influencing whether O or R wins. THAT IS A MATHEMATICAL FACT.

The problem with this is that, if it's a given that either Romney or Obama will win, then a vote for someone other than Romney is one less vote Obama needs to beat Romney. In effect, Conservatives who don't vote for Romney help Obama.

I'm not happy about our choice either. If you know of a Conservative candidate who has a chance of beating Obama, I'm interested.

[goseminoles]

” . Vote for another “third party” candidate in the presidential race. THIS VOTE WILL BE 100 PERCENT NEUTRAL in influencing whether O or R wins. THAT IS A MATHEMATICAL FACT.”

Your math is jacked if you are referring to me. A vote for Romney is a vote for Romney. No vote for Romney is no vote for Romney. How difficult to understand? I apologize if your post was not geared towards me.. if not, you are wrong. I learned this math in 2nd grade. Apples and oranges..

[BruceS]

I support your right to feel that way, but your statement "You can vote for arsenic, you can vote for cyanide because it's not arsenic, or you can vote to dilute whichever poison wins." does not apply here. If you vote 3rd party or don't vote for President, you still get undiluted cyanide or arsenic.

That said, I disgree that it is cyanide or arsenic. Romney is merely an emetic.

See my tagline for my view.