[thefactor]

You're missing the point. You usually do. If the cops had very good, reliable info that meets the reasonable suspicion standard (you don't need probable cause in this case), then they have the right to do what they did.

We don't know what their 'reliable' info was, however. If it was, in fact, a GPS device in the stolen money, then searching the immediate area would probably be a good search. We need all the info, but we don't have it. I, unlike you, do not jump to radical conclusions to fit my own views.

[from occupied ga]

You're missing the point. You usually do.

I really appreciate unintentional irony.