Posted on 06/04/2012 8:44:31 AM PDT by Sub-Driver
I've always thought the internet seemed more like a beta test than anything else.
Thats 2^64 = 18,446,744,073,709,551,616 unique IP addresses per home. Should be enough awhile :-).
That's just stupid and insanely wasteful. The equivalent of an IPv4 class B network (216 = 65,536) would be more than enough for any but the largest networks. Hell, even a class A network (224 = 16,777,216) would be far less insane than a /64 IPv6 subnet. Comcast shouldn't be given more than a single /64 for its use, and even at that, it could still give everyone a IPv4 class A address block and have tons to spare.
> I have tools at home on my primary workstation that it is useful to me to be able to access from anywhere via ssh. I would be really pissed if I couldn’t get home.
15 years ago I reached my home SSh server on DHCP roadrunner cable by using a program I wrote that determined whenever the current dynamic public IP changed, and sent it to me in email.
Later I switched to using DynDNS, when my outfacing router supported it.
These days I use a variety of outbound client protocols, depending on need... LogMeIn, GoToMyPC, Skype... Mainly because I’m behind a couple levels of firewalls and routers these days for other reasons.
If my DSL provider offers a public IP for a reasonable price and I feel I need one, I’ll pay for it.
> That’s just stupid and insanely wasteful.
Yep. Sorta defeats the whole point of having a big address space. It’ll just be sparse as hell again. And “fill up” just like the IPv4 space did.
Sigh.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.