To: mkjessup
Sadly, this discussion has degenerated to name calling and slurs. I am however, pleased to have exposed the thinness of the skin and lack of rational arguments offered by Paulbots and others of that ilk. I will be moving on to arguments about what is not what might have been. Thanks.
111 posted on
06/04/2012 8:37:57 PM PDT by
Steamburg
(The contents of your wallet is the only language Politicians understand.)
To: Steamburg
Sadly, this discussion has degenerated to name calling and slurs. I am however, pleased to have exposed the thinness of the skin and lack of rational arguments offered by Paulbots and others of that ilk. I will be moving on to arguments about what is not what might have been. Thanks.
Get lost, dirtbag.
114 posted on
06/05/2012 12:40:03 AM PDT by
mkjessup
(Eternal Vigilance (aka FReeper Tom Hoefling) has my vote for President in 2012.)
To: Steamburg
All name calling is from ROMNEYBOTS, the most
vicious anti-Conservative group in the Universe.
115 posted on
06/05/2012 3:12:14 AM PDT by
Diogenesis
("Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. " Pres. Ronald Reagan)
To: Steamburg
Romney is a liberal.
In his early years he was a liberal.
In his middle years he was a liberal.
As a candidate for the Senate he was a liberal
As governor of Massachusetts he was a liberal.
Now, we’re being told he is “severely conservative.”
To believe Romney is a conservative is to lie to oneself. Any self-respecting freeper who supports Romney should at least acknowledge that they are voting for a very liberal candidate.
In my opinion, he’s a 3rd way social corporatist, but no matter what, he’s a very liberal candidate.
117 posted on
06/05/2012 3:19:44 AM PDT by
xzins
(Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who truly support our troops pray for their victory!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson