Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mitt Romney has a Solyndra-like failure in his past, too: report [Oops...]
New York Daily News ^ | 2 June 2012 | Jonathan Lemire

Posted on 06/03/2012 5:15:23 AM PDT by Yashcheritsiy

Mitt Romney has made a bankrupt solar power company the symbol of President Obama’s inability to jumpstart the economy - but he has a similar failure on his resume, according to a report.

Romney has repeatedly ripped the Obama administration for sending federal funds to Solyndra, a California alternative energy company that went belly-up.

Decrying the White House’s decision to give Solyndra a $535 million federal loan as “crony capitalism,” Romney even held a surprise campaign stunt at the Bay Area plant Thursday.

But a day later, a Massachusetts solar panel company that received a state grant while Romney was governor filed for bankruptcy, according to the Boston Herald.

Romney personally awarded a $1.5 million renewable energy subsidy to Konarka Technologies, based in Lowell, a short time after he took office in 2003, the paper reported.

That company filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy protection and laid off 85 workers.

(Excerpt) Read more at nydailynews.com ...


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2012; mediabias; mediamalpractice; nocomparison; notsolyndra; romney; romneyhitpiece; solyndra
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 last
To: Yashcheritsiy

It must feel so good but lonely to be an absolutist. The purity of thought and deed is admirable.

Sarc


41 posted on 06/04/2012 10:43:18 AM PDT by saganite (What happens to taglines? Is there a termination date?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: saganite
It must feel so good but lonely to be an absolutist. The purity of thought and deed is admirable.

Do what? When did it become "absolutist" or "purist" for conservatives to oppose government subsidisation of preferred industries, especially when those subsidies are being given out ostensibly to help "combat" a non-existent "problem"?

I thought that was pretty much just baseline, mainstream, bargain basement conservatism. When did it suddenly become "absolutist" to simply be "conservative"?

42 posted on 06/04/2012 1:46:19 PM PDT by Yashcheritsiy (not voting for the lesser of two evils)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Yashcheritsiy

When you propose that I have sunk to the depths of degradation, that’s when. If you want to have a civil discussion mind your manners.


43 posted on 06/04/2012 5:22:28 PM PDT by saganite (What happens to taglines? Is there a termination date?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Yashcheritsiy

No, it’s not OK to waste taxpayer’s money on green job boondoggles.

The article was drawing a comparison between Romney’s investment failure and Obama’s.

My point was there is really no comparison given Romney’s gamble on the taxpayers dime (albeit wrong move) loss was about 1/600th of Barry’s.


44 posted on 06/04/2012 6:57:07 PM PDT by PhiloBedo (You gotta roll with the punches and get with what's real.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson