[Uncle Chip]

The money, according to the Motion that state filed on 4/27 was in a trust account controlled by O'Mara. So the state knew back on April 27, as demonstrated in the Motion, that GZ was not in control of the funds. His attorney was.

A request for revocation of bond is supposed to be because someone is a flight risk. The prosecutor knew as far back as its 4/27 Motion that he was not a flight risk.

This was a phony dog and pony show yesterday ---

[moehoward]

"A request for revocation of bond is supposed to be because someone is a flight risk. The prosecutor knew as far back as its 4/27 Motion that he was not a flight risk."

Exactly. This is just Corey trying to pollute the jury pool.

[Beach_Babe]

The money, according to the Motion that state filed on 4/27 was in a trust account controlled by O'Mara.

---

Zimmerman had his bond revoked not because the media or the courts or the prosecutors were "out to get him" but because on April 20th he and his wife made material misrepresentations to the court of their financial status.

This action IN ITSELF is a crime, and Zimmerman and/or his wife may suffer a penalty beyond having the bail revoked for having done so. To quote Florida statute: "Any person who intentionally provides false or misleading material information or intentionally omits material information in connection with an application for bail or for modification of bail is guilty of a misdemeanor or felony which is one degree less than that of the crime charged for which bail is sought, but which in no event is greater than a felony of the third degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or s. 775.083."

George's case largely depends on the judge's (and later possibly a jury's) assessment of George's credibility when he relays events no other person witnessed. The LAST thing George or his wife should be doing is giving his judge and potential jurors reason to doubt his truthfulness. George is his own worst enemy.