[fwdude]

You're entirely missing the point, which is that men and women are fundamentally different - different in ways that make complementarity possible and beneficial. Big deal if, as you say, the woman plays games of "reverse psychology" on their "unwitting" husbands, that only proves the point. (Have you ever stopped to consider that maybe wives are being manipulated into thinking that THEY are getting their way - tit for tat?)

In almost every case, men are physically stronger than women. Men are more emotionally aloof and controlled, an asset in many cases in which pure rationality is absolutely needed to survive. Men are the natural leaders, when this is not the case marriages suffer, I believe.

[trailhkr1]

In almost every case, men are physically stronger than women.

Yes.

Men are more emotionally aloof and controlled, an asset in many cases in which pure rationality is absolutely needed to survive.

I work with many women who run circles around men when it comes to being cool under fire. Seems you watch too many 50's movies where the women all they did was scream and faint when danger appears. I can tell you that is not how it is in real life.

Men are the natural leaders, when this is not the case marriages suffer, I believe.

Are you married? But hey if that belief works for you and your wife that's all the matters right? Just don't say that all women and marriages/relationships are like this..not even close.

So, apparently, you think men and women are fundamentally the same.

Pretty much..except for strength etc. as you mentioned and other physical attributes. There are other differences of course but nothing where the women should be the submissive one.

Wouldn’t you be more comfortable at the DUmp?

Nope. So I disagree with you I'm a lib huh?