[Olog-hai]

. . . meanwhile, you “trot out” no proof at all that contradicts the statements of myself and Kaufman (a spat between militia leaders proves nothing at all to that effect), and Wikiliberalism (majority sources al-Reuters and al-BBC)?? No offense meant, but I will have to take Kaufman’s word (a Tea Party fav) over what amounts to nothing.

If you “don’t have time” for the stuff you stir up, then don’t stir it up. The bigshots in the National Transitional Council are Islamists (I said equivalent to al-Qaeda, not necessarily al-Qaeda proper; rather like how Hamas is the analog to al-Qaeda in Palestine Israel).

[sergeantdave]

” meanwhile, you “trot out” no proof at all that contradicts the statements of myself and Kaufman”

What makes you think that you and Kaufman are credible?

In your little world, everyone in the Middle East is Al Quada or a sympathizer.

And the fact that al-Juwali has reorganized the army to include militias, and has used that army to take on al-Quada militias contradicts your opinion that al-Juwali is al-Quada.

There’s nothing in al-Juwali’s background or actions that connects him to al-Quada.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Osama_al-Juwali

You apparently don’t have the acumen to explore other possibilites that are outside your world view. Al-Juwali’s military leadership is keeping a lid on the pot and preventing it from boiling over.