And that is exactly why Ronald Reagan had such a sucessful presidency.
Yes, he made mistakes. Even some bad mistakes like Beruit.
But, all in all, his presidency was a rousing success and secured us at least one more generation of freedom which some of the bomb throwing purists are all too willing to p*ss away by trying to teach the GOP a lesson in cooperating with the re-election of BO.
Let's get a grip. Supporting Myth Romney is not worldly wise but rather abject surrender of the GOP and the nation to permanent political degeneracy.
75% or 80% is one thing (so long as abortion and persecuting churches for being socially conservative are NOT a price we are willing to pay). What does Myth offer? 1%? 2%? -3%? Are we talking about the same Ronald Reagan who proclaimed in 1976 that the GOP banner should be all bold colors and no pale pastels???? That Ronald Reagan? I don't think Ronaldus Maximus would have any enthusiasm for Myth whatsoever, nor should he. Now little leftwing Ronnie Tutu, maybe, probably, will privately find Romney a source of enthusiasm. His father, never. BTW, did Ronaldus Maximus leave the position of Reagan spokesperson to Nancy in his will or something? I don't remember that. Next up, when Nancy is gone, little Ronnie Tutu will claim to speak for his father and we won't listen to him either, nor should we.
Purists, as you call us, oppose BOTH evils, both Romney and Obozo. We do NOT owe the GOP our votes. It will have to earn them the old fashioned way by nominating acceptable candidates. Any old POS will NOT do. It is no argument at all to effectively say, as most Myth supporters do, that Myth is an absolute rank disgrace as a candidate and as a man, but, golly gee, Martha, it's either him or Obozo.
Next the Romney love slaves will be trying to see if "we" can persuade Her Hillaryness to accept the GOP nomination in 2016 because, mein Gott!, the alternative offered by the Demonrats is just too horrible to imagine (whoever or whatever he, she, or it may be).