Posted on 05/31/2012 9:56:41 PM PDT by Innovative
The widow of President Ronald Reagan says she is firmly behind Romney. And she says that her "Ronnie" would have liked Romney's business background and what she calls his "strong principles."
In a statement issued after the Romneys' visit, Mrs. Reagan said she believes that Romney has the experience and leadership skills that, in her words, "our country so desperately needs."
(Excerpt) Read more at boston.com ...
I never said anything even remotely like that.
You didn’t post anything showing that she was conservative, or political about any cause except being for abortion.
I guess you saw post 166?
Former first lady Nancy Reagan speaks out for abortion rights.
“I don’t give a damn about the Pro-Lifers,” and demanding that all mention of abortion be removed from the president’s 1987 State of the Union address.
I went back to post 42 to see your post dead, that Absolutely Nobama appeared to be quoting, and it turned out to be a post of mine responding to post 22 by NoLibZone.
The anti-freeper/Reagan post that Absolutely Nobama was quoting was actually post 22 by NoLibZone.
I have no idea why he pinged me and you to his post.
She’s doing just fine. You should be ashamed of yourself. You’re acting like the vermin in the mainstream media. She endorsed someone you don’t like, so you’re trashing her. Quite frankly, nonsense like that belongs on Moveon.Dork, not FRee Republic.
Heck, I’m confused, too.
Have a good night all.
Give it a rest. You really should seek help.
Romney is a captiatlist. He is not for big government, he’s for the private sector. What part of that makes him a socailist other then the fact that you are name calling. Just saying something doesn’t make it true. Stop hating a good man. Nancy knows a good man when she sees one, cause she loved one. You don’t own Ronald Reagan, I was for Reagan right when I first heard him speak during the primary in the election of 1980. I voted for him the day after I turned 18, so don’t tell me I don’t know who Reagan was and that Romney is a socailist, cause you are talking out the side of your mouth. Drop your hatred.
Then you don't know him at all. Go look up his record in Massachusetts. He was a big government Socialist, he was responsible for implementing government-controlled Socialist healthcare that inspired Zero to implement his. He appointed leftist judges across the board, one of whom was responsible for releasing the murderer of Brian & Beverly Mauck. Willard was one of the worst Governors in the country and absolutely antithetical to Conservatism and polar opposite to Reagan (SEE POST #12). You need to wake up and smell the Socialism.
Whatever.
He balanced their budget, he brought them out of the red. What you said does not make him a socialist. He gave Massachusets what they wanted and he forced them to balance their books. Some socialist.
You can stop repeating the talking points for his campaign, madam. I’ll inform you that it is part of the commonwealth law that MA must have a balanced budget. No Governor can take credit for that, since it is REQUIRED BY LAW. That means you’ve just made the argument that Democrats Michael Dukakis and Deval Patrick, also Socialist Governors like Willard, should be given the Republican nomination for President.
Check out post #328 and below. This one is trotting out the old “but he balanced the budget” talking point. How quaint ! Have fun with the Willardbot.
Not if he was booted from office with a 34% approval rating and had to give up his plan to run for a second term as he had announced.
Here's the part I like best:
...and are busily working to fracture the only opposition they have by encouraging conservatives to leave the Republican Party in the hands of RINOS rather than working to take over the party apparatus as they, the Leftists, have taken over the Democrat Party.
Anyone who thinks that evil doesn't target good wherever it is does not understand evil.
The idea that conservatives might abandon the GOP to the RINOs and form their own conservative party without evil collectivists infiltrating that new conservative party from the get go is utterly childlike in its naivete.
Wherever we conservatives are, we will be battling lying collectivists within our midst. That is the way of this fallen world. Read the Bible. It's all there.
We can't run. We can't hide. We can't exist apart. We must face our enemy head-on and overcome it in order to have a place in this world.
Never before in the last generation has there been a grassroots conservative insurgency comparable to the tea party movement. We would be crazy to abandon this effort to retake the GOP for conservatism and instead split off into the wilderness, in smaller weaker numbers, with the seeds of collectivism yet among us.
I am promoting conservatism. Why are you helping Obama?
Don’t be a silly goose. All I see is you pimping Willard. He’s a Socialist.
The things that you say in this reply simply are not true.
Stop deluding yourself with your bizarre fantasy-fetish of Willard not being a Socialist. He is. Your “Myth” was busted a LONG time ago.
Produce evidence if you can that Nancy was “manipulated” in any way, manner, shape or form.
Or else shut up while you’re still not that far behind.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.