Nope.
But for what you prescribe to succeed America would have to undergo a vast cultural change in the direction of conservative values.
It would make as much sense to suggest you are engaging in psyops, encouraging the enthusiasts to invest their energy in a totally doomed to fail strategy.
Rather than concentrating on taking our culture back, which is the prerequisite to an amendment succeeding.
If you disagree with my analysis of how an amendment is not a strategy likely to succeed, why don’t you point out where my analysis is wrong, rather than attacking my motives?
Could it be because you can’t attack the analysis successfully?
How does living in a dream world, and attacking personally those who point out that it IS a dream world, help the cause?
I don't have to -- because our FRiend already did the work, on the previous post. These pro-marriage propositions keep succeeding everywhere they are put to a vote, and if marriage defenders start now, the issue can be decided with a constitutional amendment.
Constitutional amendments are usually ratified by the legislature .... but there is another way to ratify amendments and decide matters as The People, and that is the state ratification convention, identical to those that ratified the Constitution in 1788-91, and also, coincidentally, identical to those that passed legal ordinances of secession in 1860 and 1861, most of which were ratified by the People by plebiscite.
Homosexual activists can sway courts and traduce legislators and governors (like Romney); but they haven't succeeded, so far, in bullswoggling the People. Ratification by convention and plebiscite would be a valid way to keep a DOMA amendment out of the hands of society's enemies.