Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: babble-on

Actually, the New “new source review” is being construed to include routine maintenance.

Sierra argues ANY repair reopens the plant’s operating permit, forcing a 20 year old plant to meet best available technology.


10 posted on 05/30/2012 6:11:03 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: Eric in the Ozarks; babble-on
Congress passed New Source Review in the 70s and it has been in and out of court until 2007 and the SCOTUS decision which was thought to be the last.

Bush declined to implement, punting it to the next prez. Bush knew the enviros wouldn't sue him because he would be out of office in 18 months.

The issue has always been about maintenance. It's obvious that a new plant would face the revue, but industry used maintenance of existing plants to increase the capacity of the existing plants, avoiding the revue.

So now the enviros are going after them and it is not economically reasonable for industry to go back and retrofit the older/smaller plants.

15 posted on 05/30/2012 9:26:14 AM PDT by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson