Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Old Teufel Hunden

Barry didn’t write a damned thing as editor of the Review. No one who was there recalls seeing anything.


34 posted on 05/29/2012 8:28:03 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: Eric in the Ozarks
"Barry didn’t write a damned thing as editor of the Review. No one who was there recalls seeing anything."

If that turns out to be true, there's no more proof needed that he got the post because he was black, not on any merit.
45 posted on 05/29/2012 8:52:21 AM PDT by Old Teufel Hunden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

To: Eric in the Ozarks
Barry didn’t write a damned thing as editor of the Review. No one who was there recalls seeing anything.

Respectfully, it's believed Obama wrote the unsigned six-page note at 103 Harv. Law Rev. 823 (1990).

Law Reviews have signed articles and unsigned notes. It's unheard of for a Law Review editor not to have a signed article. Obama didn't.

However, it's thought he wrote the note on whether unborn children have a right to sue a mother for potential damage due to drug use, etc. Obama reasoned they couldn't due to Roe v. Wade and an Illinois Supreme Court case, among other arguments. It was a pie-in-the-sky article - theoretical and not practical law. Something that just required being pompous and not a lot of research; certainly nothing that could be attacked on academic grounds.

55 posted on 05/29/2012 9:31:55 AM PDT by Scoutmaster (You knew the job was dangerous when you took it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson