Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DiogenesLamp

Btw, I wrote ‘after his divorce in 1970, he lived in a little dump at street level...’

And you counter with his address in 1960.

Read it again. AFTER HIS DIVORCE I wrote.


318 posted on 05/29/2012 4:09:33 PM PDT by Fred Nerks (fair dinkum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 253 | View Replies ]


To: Fred Nerks
Btw, I wrote ‘after his divorce in 1970, he lived in a little dump at street level...’

And you counter with his address in 1960.

It is germane as to whether or not pictures could have been taken in his house. You seemed to think he never had one. Apart from that, we don't know exactly from WHICH residence Gilbert is supposed to have obtained the pictures. It could have been left in the house at the house on Kalihili. I've moved into houses before with leftover pictures in the attic.

I had actually thought about getting someone to go to that House and see if the current owner could be paid to allow photographs of the wooden floor, which presumably still exists. If the wood grain in the floor matches the pictures, we will have proof positive that is the location the photographs were taken in.

Read it again. AFTER HIS DIVORCE I wrote.

Yes, but we were discussing whether or not Frank Davis took nude pictures of Women in his house. Apparently this Gilbert fellow has done some fine research on this issue. As i've mentioned, he apparently has a photo of Frank Davis sitting on that same couch (and with that same lamp) that the nude photo was taken on.

336 posted on 05/29/2012 5:27:29 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp (Partus Sequitur Patrem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 318 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson