Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Fred Nerks

When people hold pre-conceived notions, it’s amazing what their eyes don’t see.

Anyone who who clings to any part of the mythological parentage of Zero won’t see what is clearly there.


207 posted on 05/28/2012 8:11:31 PM PDT by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies ]


To: little jeremiah

So SAD Washington University transcript is forged?

What of the divorce record SAD/Obama Sr. supposedly done Jan-March 1964?

Just curious some connections there.

Does Zero not know who his father is? Why does he visit Kenya with supposed family members in the 1980’s?


211 posted on 05/28/2012 8:32:49 PM PDT by TheBigJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 207 | View Replies ]

To: little jeremiah

It’s got to be something deeply psychological, the only ‘evidence’ there is that Stanley Ann Dunham was in any way related to zero comes straight out of ‘Dreams’ and yet the very people who will tell you that the book is a myth, cling to her motherhood like it was a liferaft.

He shows up in photographs in Hawaii for the first time with Stanley Armour Dunham on the beach and with Stanley Ann at the zoo, when he’s around two and a half to three years of age, and there’s nothing of him with his ‘grandparents’ ...

WHERE DID SHE HIDE THAT CHILD FOR TWO TO THREE YEARS, IF SHE WAS HIS MOTHER? AND WHY DID MADELYN TELL HER RELATIVES THAT THE BOY’S MOTHER HAD DIED IN 1970?

I’m not asking for too much...am I? All I am asking is, think about it. What can anyone show me that makes Stanley Ann Dunham the mother? WHAT!

A divorce decree that gave her custody of an unidentified child is all we’ve got.


212 posted on 05/28/2012 8:38:24 PM PDT by Fred Nerks (fair dinkum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 207 | View Replies ]

To: little jeremiah

Anyone who who clings to any part of the mythological parentage of Zero won’t see what is clearly there.


The question of who is Barack Obama, will not be answered until history is written and then it won’t include documents (they have been destroyed), rather, it will be derived from oral history. It will be convoluted and eerie.


220 posted on 05/28/2012 9:12:07 PM PDT by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 207 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson