Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SatinDoll; rogue yam; Innovative; altura; netmilsmom; unkus; betty boop
As governor of Massachusetts, Romney chose very liberal candidates for that State’s Supreme Court. He now says he had no choice in the matter.

Appears you didn't actually read the article:

Romney, Massachusetts governor from 2003 to 2007, did not have a chance to name someone to that state's highest court. But he sent signals that he wanted courts to move in a more conservative direction.

Romney frequently railed against a 2003 ruling from the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court that legalized same-sex marriage. In 2005, he told the Federalist Society, a conservative legal group, that the justices were threatening "great peril to the culture of our entire land," The Boston Globe reported at the time.

Although Romney's picks for lower state courts included many Democrats, his advisers say he was constrained by the state's liberal tilt, and he chose a Federalist Society member to run his selection process.

Since it is quite obvious that you didn't read the article it's also likely that you have no knowledge of who the Federalist Society is.

Educate yourself.

The Federalist Society

I can't stand lazy FReepers.

FReegards!


81 posted on 05/27/2012 10:03:05 AM PDT by Agamemnon (Darwinism is the glue that holds liberalism together)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]


To: Agamemnon
I know what the Federalist Society is, thank you very much. This means he had enough brains to CYA for scrutiny later. Let's make it clear, here: Romney's lack of conscience or fierceness in projecting conservatism doesn't mean he lacks intelligence.

Romney is a SELF-AVOWED Progressive (read: national socialist). He's also a Globalist, just like George H.W. Bush. They are all about money, power, and who will eventually wield both. Neither truly gives a damn about the God-given rights of U.S. citizens.

Globalists care nothing for conservative values. First and foremost, they see themselves as world citizens, responsible for maintaining peace and security world-wide through international commerce. Thus maintaining a primed military ‘machine’, ready to provide the all important security overseas is a necessary part of their plans.

That military is paid for by our tax revenue, the hard earned dollars of Americans, and staffed by the sons and daughters of people who no longer have jobs, as those have all been moved offshore by the above mentioned “world citizens”.

84 posted on 05/27/2012 2:24:46 PM PDT by SatinDoll (NO FOREIGN NATIONALS AS OUR PRESIDENT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson