No, I ignore it. . . . It's nothing more than an immoral, unconstitutional court opinion. . . .
So you IGNORE an unconstitutional court opinion, which could be overturned with a good SC appointment or two, which in turn would be the biggest pro-life victory we've had ever since abortion became legal. You thereby prove your irrelevance.
Every officer of government, in every branch, at every level, in this free republic is required to swear to support the Constitution, not the courts.
-- Article VI, the United States Constitution“The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution..."
Can you point me to that part of the Supreme Law of the Land that would indicate otherwise, or perhaps some amendment I've missed?
Indeed. Complete and utter irrelevance. Then again, this is a "presidential candidate" who seems to have an enormous amount of time to not only post on political forums, but to declare that no principled conservative would vote for Romney. I am fairly certain his relevance to the political process is bordering on none anyway.
I've heard these empty promises my whole adult life. And still, the holocaust continues.
And will, until destruction falls on our heads, as long as we continue to elect pro-choice democrats like Obama and Romney.
-- Thomas Jefferson"God who gave us life gave us liberty. Can the liberties of a nation be secure when we have removed a conviction that these liberties are the gift of God? Indeed I tremble for my country when I reflect that God is just, that his justice cannot sleep forever."