Balanced approach? LOL. Mitt's approach will favor the State. What we need is an "unbalanced" approach. Government needs to be drastically cut in power and scope. Read what Harding did in his term.
Mitt's approach is a joke. Do you realize that the RATs and the RINOs will push him easily to the left.
It's all words with Mitt right now. His actual record in MASS shows someone who is very much at ease with increasing the power of the State.
To those who think Mitt will turn our Republic towards Liberty and prosperity I have only this to day -- prepare to be very disappointed.
Throughout his entire term, the MSM and the RATS will be yelling see how the far right-wing Mitt is not improving things." And they will be right as far as not improving things. Conservatives will be marginalized by Mitt and his vile staff. The RATs will easily win in 2016 to continue our push towards rabid Socialism.
A Mitt will will NOT change our destination of Socialism.
Romney will campaign on taxes, but not on reducing Gov't. We are going broke, and yet 'they' promote growth in certain areas, ie financial, Gov't contracting, Defense, and put it on our backs in the form of debt. If your not in those sectors your a nobody.
Yes, cutting the spending would initially raise the unemployment rate and reduce the GDP. But, those things need to happen in order to reach a healthy economy.