An excellent point and one I make often. The idea of the US fighting 2 World Wars on behalf of the former colonial power that once owned it, and whose banks have used the US (private corporation) Federal Reserve to guarantee their debt - monetizing it through taxation of US citizens, inflation, and deflation of US wealth assets is tantamount to a re-enslavement of the US to European banking elites.
It was used to prop up the USSR with Ex-Im credits etc. until Reagan made the Soviets pay for aid with hard cash. The USSR fell w/o a shot and the rest is history.
In 2001 Bush entered office with greatly declining US deficits (thanks to Republican Congressional restraint)and the trailing ends of the peace dividend and the worry was US economic contraction -- until 9/11.
We're at war again, have been for >10 years. Got $4T in Bush deficits in 8 years and $5T in Obama deficits in 3 and a contracting nation struggling under the weight of it.
Romney, unlike the Bush's and oddly, even Obama is not of the European debt cycle machine. He didn't make his money becoming indebted to and propped up by the Euro-classes and the Soros machine. In that way he is Reaganesque, and the enslavement cabal have much to fear from his Presidency, because his religion demands American ascendancy and supremacy, not indebtedness and decline.
I am not Mormon, just speaking with a knowledge of Mormon philosophical underpinnings, and their general command of business sense and market principles.
I listen to the Mormon Tabernacle Choir's rendition of "The Messiah," because the musicianship is excellent. It won't persuade me to become a Mormon, but I employ it for my listening pleasure.
Same with Romney. I'd employ him for my economic pleasure, because I think he has the possibility of rolling back Obama's mischief.
And as Rush noted yesterday, the guy stays on message.
FReegards!
