Replies

Yup, and when the history of CF is definitively written, you skeptopaths are going to have a lot to answer for. Not just for Pons/Fleischmann, but Bockris and many others, and outright fraud (MIT "failed replication").

LOL! "The Truth is Out There."

Still lying. The article I cited did not originate in a blog.

I didn't say otherwise.

Science is discussed everywhere nowadays, including in blogs (but LENR/CANR is NOT a "blog", any more than FR is).

The business of science is still done in journals. The quality of blog discussions is all over the place. LENR/CANR is a personal website hosted on Wordpress.

The work, IMO, was both thorough and carefully done. I see no errors of any significance.

That's only works for people who are impressed by your gullibility. I'm not. Where has the article been cited over the past 19 years?

"That's only works for people who are impressed by your gullibility. I'm not. Where has the article been cited over the past 19 years?"

Still trying to sell the idea that citation (or lack of same) actually means something. It doesn't. Address the science in the paper. Show me the errors. Your shuckin' and jivin' is getting old.

I have yet to see a single skeptopath actually reference the journal articles that supposedly disprove LENR. Not even once.