Actually, Pons/Fleischmann's peer-reviewed article in JEAC has never been refuted. A lot of smoke has been thrown up by you and your fellow skeptopaths, but when one traces through the real science, P/F have refuted every criticism.
"And you still can't show where your paper has been cited since 1993."
WHY do you keep dragging this argument up?? It has nothing whatsoever to do with the validity of the science. WHY don't you address the supposed errors/mistakes in the paper itself?? My guess is because you simply can't, and are forced to fall back on specious arguments of this sort.
And that sort of tactic is the absolute rule when any of your fellow skeptopaths show up. Cite any actual experimental evidence, and they run like vampires when they smell garlic.
Your actions make Rossi look like a pillar of veracity.
Being ignored is just as bad. As I said their careers were ruined.
WHY do you keep dragging this argument up?? It has nothing whatsoever to do with the validity of the science.
Because publishing articles and then having them cited by subsequent articles that either affirm the claims or refute them is how most science is done, not in blogs as is done with cold fusion.
WHY don't you address the supposed errors/mistakes in the paper itself??
Because I'm not the one making the extraordinary claim. I'm not the one pumping up a disreputable science filled with con artists like Rossi and scientists like George Miley making claims he can't back up.
Your actions make Rossi look like a pillar of veracity.
Wow! A backhanded admission, after months of daily hype by you and Kevmo that Rossi was making things up.