To: Moonman62
"When are you going to address it, rather than providing links to bottom tier articles from bottom tier journals copy and pasted to someone's personal website?" I did address it. Read the publication. Show me the errors of experimentation that invalidate the findings.
Don't come out with vague bullshit about "bottom tier articles from bottom tier journals" when you were willing to accept a NON-PEER REVIEWED internal research report of far lesser quality and thoroughness.
Intellectual dishonesty at every turn. You just can't stop, can you?
To: Wonder Warthog
Where’s the scientific validation of this article? Where has it been cited since 1993? And you still haven’t addressed the science. Your link to a personal website is your meager contribution.
28 posted on
05/30/2012 7:18:12 PM PDT by
Moonman62
(The US has become a government with a country, rather than a country with a government.)
To: Wonder Warthog
Don't come out with vague bullshit about "bottom tier articles from bottom tier journals" when you were willing to accept a NON-PEER REVIEWED internal research report of far lesser quality and thoroughness. The NASA memo was one in a million. I explained why it was believable. You can't automatically assume that every piece of junk you link to falls into the same category.
29 posted on
05/31/2012 7:42:38 AM PDT by
Moonman62
(The US has become a government with a country, rather than a country with a government.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson