Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Wonder Warthog
The original peer reviewed journal is a cold fusion joke, not much better than a Wordpress blog. From Wiki:
The Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry (ISSN 0022-0728) is a peer-reviewed scientific journal on electroanalytical chemistry, published by Elsevier.

The journal, which the New York Times describes as "a specialty publication not widely circulated,"[1] became more broadly known in 1989 when Martin Fleischmann and Stanley Pons published a description of their controversial cold fusion research in it, withdrawing their work from publication in Nature after questions were raised during peer review there.[1]


20 posted on 05/27/2012 6:54:21 PM PDT by Moonman62 (The US has become a government with a country, rather than a country with a government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: Moonman62

A blog has dated posts and I don’t see it. That LENR site is an informational website. Wordpress is a first class organization by the way.


21 posted on 05/27/2012 7:04:19 PM PDT by dennisw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: Moonman62
"The original peer reviewed journal is a cold fusion joke, not much better than a Wordpress blog. From Wiki:

LOL. Desperation strikes again. You get more ridiculous all the time.

"The Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry (ISSN 0022-0728) is a peer-reviewed scientific journal on electroanalytical chemistry, published by Elsevier."

Elsevier is one of the premier science publishing houses in the world. Their journals are top notch.

"The journal, which the New York Times describes as "a specialty publication not widely circulated,"[1] became more broadly known in 1989 when Martin Fleischmann and Stanley Pons published a description of their controversial cold fusion research in it, withdrawing their work from publication in Nature after questions were raised during peer review there.[1]

LOL. ALL "specialty journals" are "not widely circulated". And I hardly take the NYT as an authoritative voice in science publication. Or much of anything other than liberal propaganda. And you quote it HERE??? Ludicrous.

As I said....lies and spin.....it's what you do. Try actually addressing the science instead of trying to sell the ridiculous point that have a site hosted on Wordpress somehow invalidates the contents of the site hosted.

23 posted on 05/28/2012 6:34:44 AM PDT by Wonder Warthog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson