Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: null and void
From the Summary: "As permitted under Arkansas law, the jury’s options in this case were limited to two: either convict on one of the offenses, or acquit on all offenses."

Technically, this didn't happen and is the basis of the majority's opinion. The basis for the majority's decision is really weak. The Arkansas law in this regard is clearly unconstitutional.

You are correct about the wise latina getting this one right.

16 posted on 05/24/2012 8:40:48 PM PDT by SeaHawkFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: SeaHawkFan

I don’t think it ever got to that point. No verdict was officially rendered before the jury was dismissed.


23 posted on 05/24/2012 8:51:25 PM PDT by MacMattico
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: SeaHawkFan
Technically, this didn't happen

Technicalities are important. If the jury has not officially entered a verdict then no verdict exists regardless of the state of the jury at a given time.

25 posted on 05/24/2012 8:54:03 PM PDT by garbanzo (It's the end of the world as we know it and I feel fine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson