The most amazing part is there is not a single relevant fact in the article.
This is like a midget standing on a stool trying to convince you he’s six feet tall.
Who cares about facts when a dim lies? Rush tore this report apart like wet toilet paper.
Ya. I read it and scratch my head wondering where the actual content is amid the verbiage insulting the reader, insulting the reader’s friends, oversimplified explanations of non-sequiturs, rationalizing increases as stability misrepresented by scaling values, pointing blame at prior legislatures, and declarations that any POTUS would do the same. Amounts to “well, if you subtract baseline increases, inflation, obligatory crisis-control spending, legislated spending, and just about anything else, you can only blame him for 0.4% of the increase.” I’d say I’m unconvinced, but I can’t make out what I’m supposed to be [un]convinced of.