Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rottndog

My guess is there is no commercial viability to reprocessing. Since the Carter days, we’ve choked off nuclear power, so it would be “Reprocess fuel for what reactors??”


57 posted on 05/23/2012 4:40:32 PM PDT by Cyber Liberty (Obama considers the Third World morally superior to the United States.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]


To: Cyber Liberty
Commercial viability is guaranteed simply based on the number of spent fuel rods being stored around the country. It's far more expensive to store and monitor them than it would be to pay someone to take them for reprocessing. And there are decades worth of spent fuel rods that need to be reprocessed. Also, the reclaimed uranium would go right back into the market place. Current nuc plants still require fuel replenishment—that uranium still has to come from somewhere.

Of course I think that's part of the rub preventing reprocessing...there are vested financial interests in the uranium supply business that would be hurt by an increased supply on the market. And I'm sure those very same interests have poured a great deal of money into politician's pockets to keep the status quo.

58 posted on 05/23/2012 4:52:04 PM PDT by rottndog (Be Prepared for what's coming AFTER America....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson