Women use doctors more than men because of pregnancy, why shouldn’t they pay more for coverage.
If you remove pregnancy coverage for the policy, the costs are the same.
Maybe pregnancy coverage should be an option that women (or couples) can choose. Thus those who choose to self-insure for it or who are not at risk of pregnancy don’t have to pay for it if they don’t want to.
I would think heart problems in men and blue collar injuries, notably back injuries in men might offset females use of doctors to some degree.
So why doesn't 0blather and the dims go after auto insurance companies for discriminating against men? A male under 25 pays almost twice as much as a female of the same age in the same family.
I'm so tired of this Marxist "professor" and "community organizer" dictating things and making pronouncements about how businesses should be run when he's never managed so much as a lemonade stand!!!!