Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: PreciousLiberty
The least amount of cost doesn't translate in the safest design.

I used to provide beacon readout for the eastern range at KSC and Canaveral. Sitting in on Space-X’s first launch gave me a detailed education on the problems with 9 motors.

There are certain things government does very well in, such as a standing military.....etc., also space flight.

If cost is the holy grail for you, be prepared for a body count that will prove my point.

I have every hope of success....just not the direction that Space-X has taken it.

Once again, Atlas is probably going to prove the best platform.

43 posted on 05/21/2012 7:35:42 PM PDT by Puckster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]


To: Puckster; KevinDavis

First off, sorry about the mixup with Kevin - must have looked at the wrong post for the name.

“The least amount of cost doesn’t translate in the safest design.
I used to provide beacon readout for the eastern range at KSC and Canaveral. Sitting in on Space-X’s first launch gave me a detailed education on the problems with 9 motors.”

“The least amount of cost” for a commercial venture involves not having failures. Failures mean lower profits and fewer customers going forward. Clearly the first priority at SpaceX is reliability - as it should be, and must be for manned flight.

There is no inherent problem with nine motors - they provide redundancy in the case of one or more motor failures.

“There are certain things government does very well in, such as a standing military.....etc., also space flight.”

The “government” doesn’t “do” space flight - they pay contractors to build the vehicles.

“If cost is the holy grail for you, be prepared for a body count that will prove my point.”

LOL...first of all there won’t be any body count until SpaceX gets through the entire manned vehicle test regimen. That will mean a lot more Falcon + Dragon flights. SpaceX has eleven more cargo flights scheduled for the ISS, that’ll go a long way in working any kinks out. That’s a nice contract at $1.6 billion total.

“I have every hope of success....just not the direction that Space-X has taken it.”

We shall see - that was a picture perfect launch this morning, eh? All nine engines functioned flawlessly from what I saw and heard. Do you have any contradictory information?

BTW, it showed a strength of the Falcon system when they aborted the first launch. The spacecraft is anchored to the ground until it can be determined that all systems are within acceptable parameters after ignition. Unlike solid fuel motors, the liquid fueled Merlin engines can be shut down if needed.

“Once again, Atlas is probably going to prove the best platform.”

LOL! Which manned capsule is in the works for Atlas, again? Also Atlas has only half the payload capacity of Falcon Heavy. Atlas is mired in the defense contractor mentality, we’ll see if it can be made competitive on launch pricing.

At any rate, although I didn’t watch the launch live, it was exciting to see the video this morning and to hear that everything is on track including solar panel deployment. Now we’ll see how the orbital trials go - I’m definitely pulling for SpaceX to hit a home run on this mission!


145 posted on 05/22/2012 6:41:49 AM PDT by PreciousLiberty (Pray for America!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson