Posted on 05/21/2012 8:14:25 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
If his nose be broke, you must acquit the bloke!
Its so easy to get confused. ‘Trayvon’ is such a popular name, you know.
Yeah, like 300 feet.
why do they keep saying zimmerman followed him???? he didnt follow him......he was attacked by trayvon as he, zimmerman was going back to his car....
No one is making any noise that the autopsy showed the innocent little waif had Marijuana in his system.
At this point all the info about Trayvon and Zimmerman is interesting, but none of this rises to the level of a cae the nation needs to discuss, it does not tell us much about whites allegedly “hunting down” black people. It’s all just a great big reality show at this point.
The reason no one is making any noise that the autopsy shows Marijunana in his system is because it is irrelevent to the case.
There are plenty of drugs that make people aggressive and likely to instigate a fight - drugs like PCP, meth, etc. - but cannabis is not one of them.
Also cannabis stays in the system long after it has stopped effecting the user (up to 30 days). So it is possible that Travyon could have smoked pot a week or two prior to all of this, and it would have absolutely no bearing on the trial.
All that being said - you are responsible for your own actions. If you are drunk and you go start a fight, you are responsible for what happens to you - it’s YOUR fault, not the beer’s fault.
Why would they write this just a couple of paragraphs after acknowledging that no such evidence exists? Talk about agenda driving spinning.
Palm Beach Post, helping prosecutors lie for over 40 years...
>WFTV learned Martin was just a feet from the steps of the home<
Am unable to locate any such reference from WFTV about this. More media BS
” “If the evidence shows that Zimmerman physically assaulted 17-year-old Trayvon Martin first...”
If I had won 100 million in the super lotto..
"It wasn't my brother, it was someone else. Besides, everybody knows that ALL blacks look alike to crackers."
that make no medical logic.
either way it impairs brain chemestry and the ability to rationalize of the user. It also creates moodswings depending on whatever else in his sysmem. All with no predictability just inivitability. A potheat with no rational mental stability.
It is VERY relavent and only adds another reasonable doubt and just even more to the preponderance of the evidence that this should NEVER reach a jury.
I think you are missing my point; tetrahydracanniboids (THC) stay in the body for up to 30 days longer than it effects your brain chemistry.
Or, to put this in simpler, more familiar terms... it would be like setting up a road block to check for DWIs if the test that they used only showed if you had used alcohol in the past 30 days.
I’m not sure who told you that cannabis causes you to feel “invincible” but that’s just not true.
The facts in this case seem to be open and shut, it looks to be a very clear case of self-defense. The fact that the kid had smoked pot within the past 30 days has absolutely nothing to do with Trayvon assaulting Zimmerman and ending up shot dead.
Had the toxicology report showed meth or PCP, which *do* cause aggression and feelings of invinciblility, I would wholeheartedly agree with your conclusion.
Why then, is the video repeatedly removed from YouTube?
It should be easy enough to identy who the person in the video actually is, and lay the matter to rest conclusively.
Schaeffer is an idiot.
You don't adopt laws based on the rare and exceptional event.
It is not intended to be challenged by habitual repeat criminals, major or minor, but by random and unique victims.
No controversy there.
Schaeffer is an idiot.
You don't adopt laws based on the rare and exceptional event.
It is not intended to be challenged by habitual repeat criminals, major or minor, but by random and unique victims.
No controversy there.
Schaeffer is an idiot.
You don't adopt laws based on the rare and exceptional event.
It is not intended to be challenged by habitual repeat criminals, major or minor, but by random and unique victims.
No controversy there.
Schaeffer is an idiot.
You don't adopt laws based on the rare and exceptional event.
It is not intended to be challenged by habitual repeat criminals, major or minor, but by random and unique victims.
No controversy there.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.