*Yawn*
Ok, so here it is again....
“Understanding that
1. you’re attempting to guide the conversation to get in your talking points
2. I’m not being paid to converse with you
I have no need to answer your question.
I already made my point and was amused by your redirection.
But just in case you (as it seems) missed (or ignored) all but the first couple words....
I said, “Obama is not “progressive” in the way that libs define it.
He is a Marxist, Communist trained, Muslim Brotherhood Jihad loving, Israeli hating, raised in Indonesia “progressive” who has been quoted as saying he wants to fundamentally change the United States.”
See all that other stuff that you conveniently ignored? Well here’s the point, it doesn’t matter at all what YOU say a progressive is, it matters what Obama says a progressive is. Cause no one else in the top two love the Muslim Brotherhood and hate Israel nor have been quoted as saying he wants to “fundamentally change the United States.”
Sorry FRiend, I’m not answering your talking points. Pick up a new card from HuffPo and try again with a less experienced poster. You’re not on Digg, ya know.
Bless your Heart!
Socialism is the goal of all progressive liberals, and socialism is at the heart of Marxism/Commmunism.
That statement sounds pro-liberal to me, as you are trying to cut off the connection that exists between progressives and the end result they work towards. Why would you want to obfuscate a connection that actually exists?
The term "progressive" is one of those wink and nod keywords they use to pat each other on the knee, under the table, as their hearts glow, and their faces shine with big smiles at the utopian dream of total government control (their control) over everything.
And of course the American Communists have always been an intractable element of the organized labor movement.
Every liberal "progressive" knows that the Communist Party of the USA is endorsing Obama, and has backed the Democrat Party ever since the days of Lyndon Johnson (?) and they have no problem with it. That should prove the point.
There is something very unsettling to the conservative heart in this statement you made, and repeated, "Obama is not “progressive” in the way that libs define it."
It is a false statement.
Romney as a "progressive" liberal is on the same page with all of them.